This is a self-audit, not a client study. We ran locked, repeatable prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Google AI Overviews to see what public evidence about centurycampaigns.com was easy to retrieve and cite.
The scoreboard is simple: prompt, date, engine, answer, and source links. We noted where the site was understood, where citations were thin, and which pages needed clearer language. The first fixes were practical—tighten service explanations, make location explicit, and connect related pages so a reader or answer engine can follow the evidence.
There is no ranking promise here. The point is a repeatable baseline anyone can run on their own site. The free Audit is available at /audit/ if you want a structured starting point.